2020年6月英语四级阅读理解(2020年6月英语四级阅读真题及答案)

大学英语四级阅读理解，对于我们来讲有所不同，因为它在我们每一个阶段的学习中都会遇到，可以说是我们最为熟悉的题型之一了。另外，经过大家前期的备考，词汇量类似的基础知识储备基本上也已经问题不是特别大了，在这种情况下，梳理解题思路就显得格外重要。今天四六级为大家分享2020年6月英语四级阅读练习题及答案(10)，希望对您有所帮助。

英语四级阅读练习题及答案(10)

Section B

Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived.

You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2.

Being Objective on Climate Change

A.Last week，Craig Rucker,a climate-change skeptic and the executive director of a nonprofit organization called the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow(CFACT)，tweeted a quotation supposedly taken from a 1922 edition of the Washington Post：“Within a few years it is predicted due to ice melt the sea will rise&make most coastal cities uninhabitable.”The intent，of course，was to poke fun at current headlines about climate change.

B.Rucker’s organization is a member ofthe Cooler Heads Coalition，an umbrella organization operated by the Competitive Enterprise Institute，a nonprofit that prides itself on its opposition to environmental ists.Rucker himself is part of a network of bloggers，op-cd writers，and policy-shop executives who argue that climate change is either a hoax or all example of left-wing hysteria.Surfacing old newspaper clips is one of their favorite games.They also make substantive arguments about climate policy,but the sniping may be more effective.There is no stronger rhetorical tool than ridicule.

C.In this case，Ruckcr’s ridicule seems misplaced.After spending a few minutes poking around online，1 was able to find both the Washington Post article and the longer SourCe material that it came from—a weather report issued by the U.S.consul in Bergen，Norway,and sent to the State Department on october 1 0，1 922.The report didn’t say anything about coasts being inundated.This isn’t surprising.Scientists wete smart back then，too,and they knew that melting sea ice wouldn’t appreciably raise sea levels.any more than a melting ice cube raises the level of water in a glass.

D.Rucker ultimately corrected his tweet once commenters pointed out the misquote.Through Twitter,he informed me that he had taken the line from a Washington Times op—ed by Richard Rahn，a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.When I contacted Rahn’s office.a press representative acknowledged that Rahn had copied the quote from other bloggers and columnists;the fabricated sentence appears in articles at reason.corn and texasgopvote.corn.The fabricated line seems to have been inserted around 2011.but the original article has been circulating online since 2007.

E. The statement about rising sea levels aside，1 922 really was a strange period in the Svalbard archipelago.the area described by the weather report.The islands lie halfway between Norway and the North Pole,at a latitude that puts them several hundred miles farther north than Barrow,alaska.“The Arctic seems to be warming up.”the report read.In August of that year,a geologist near the island of Spitsbergen sailed as far north as eighty-one degrees.twenty.nine minutes in ice-free water.This was highly unusual.The previous several summers had likewise been warrn.Seal populations had moved farther north，and formerly unseen stretches of coast were now accessible.

F.What are we to take from this historical evidence?A central tenet for Rucker and his colleagues is mat today’s sea.ice retreat。warming surface temperatures，and similar observations are short-lived anomalies of a kind that often happened in the past—and that overzealous scientists and gullible media are quick to drum up crises where none exist.Favorite examples include numerous newspaper articles from the nineteen.seventies that predicted the advent of a new ice age.In fact.it's possible to find articles from nearly every decade of the past century that seem to imply information about the climate that turned out to be premature or wrong.

G.The 1922 article has been quoted repeatedly by Rucker’s comrades-in-arms since its 2007 rebirth in the Washington Times.For nearly that long，scientists have been objecting.Gavin Schmidt，a climate modeler and the deputy director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies，points out that what was an anomaly in 1922 is now the norm：the waters near Spitsbergen are clear of ice at the end of every summer.More important，long-term temperature and sea-ice records indicate that the dramatic sea-ice retreat in the early nineteen.twenties was short-lived.It also occurred locally around svalbard—the unusual conditions didn’t even encompass the whole Norwegian Sea，let alone the rest of the Arctic.

H. 0ver the weekend，after retracting his previous tweet，Rucker posted a link to a blog item about a different article.this one a 1932 New York Times story.The eighty-year-old headline reads，“The Next Great Deluge Forecast By Science：Melting Polar Ice Caps to Raise the Level of the Seas and Flood the Continents.”That one sounded juicy,and，indeed，this time the text was correct：that really is what the headline said.Ironically,the lcad researcher cited in the piece was a German scientist named Alfred Wegener,who has sometimes been considered a hero of climate-change deniers for a completely different reason.Wegener is known for proposing the phenomenon of continental drift starting around the First Wbrid War,The idea was ridiculed before gaining acceptance in the nineteen-sixties，once

ample evidence had been amassed.Wegener’s lifc story,then，is used to support the idea that the small number of researchers in the field who downplay the risk of anthropogenic climate change will one day prevail.

I.In reality,the potential for anthropogenic global warming was being discussed earlier than continental drift.and took even longer to gain wide acceptance.The versatile Professor Wegener was a geophysicist and polar researcher who spent much of his career studying meteorology in Greenland，and trying to unlock the secrets of the Earth’s past.His elevated place in the current climate-change debate is

abstracted from history.

J.In any case，it’s not clear that the bloggers linking to the 1932 article read much beyond the headline.Thc article does discuss a collapse of the ice sheets that would raise sea levels by more than a hundred feet—but it says that event lies thirty to forty thousand years in the future.There’s nothing wrong with examining old newspaper articles for clues about climate conditions in the past.Legitimate climate researchers look at historical documents of all kinds.However,a good-faith effort to arrive at the truth would not rely on cherry-picking catchy headlines.It would require considering the context and looking at all the evidence.At the very least.it wouldn’t allow for deliberate distortions.A prediction that the ice caps might melt by the year 42，000 is hardly all example of climate alarmism.

46.Unlike melting ice in the glass，the melting sea ice cannot easily raise sea level.

47.Rucker maintains that the climate.change is just a terrible fantasy of the left-wing or even a totally distrustful matter.

48.It is fair to search for every piece of evidence to approach the truth without distortion.

49.As for Rucker,the clear purpose of tweeting this quotation is to laugh at the articles about climate change.

50.The various unusual phenomena about climate change are merely non-exist alarms claimed by the scientists and media，would be short-lived.

51.The drastic sea-ice melt occurred around Svalbard was only local and limited.

52.It is normal for the waters at northern latitude 8 1 degrees，29 minutes to be covered with ice.

53.It is embraced that the number of climate-change researchers will be multiplied one day.

54.It is ironic for the leading figure of climate-change opponents to quote this piece.

55.In reality,the universal information in articles about climate change is eventually proved to be unbelievable.

参考答案：

46.Unlike melting ice in the glass，the melting sea ice can not easily raise sea level.与杯中的融冰不同，海中的融冰不会使海面快速升高。

选c

47.Rucker maintains that the climate change is just a terrible fantasy of the left-wing or even a totally distrustful matter.洛克认为气候变化的论点不过是左派的糟糕的幻想，甚至根本就是一个骗局。

选b

48.Itisfairto searchfor everypiece ofevidence to approach the truth without distortion.努力寻找证据，真实地靠近真相，这点是不可争议的

选j

49.As for Rucker,the clear purpose of tweeting this quotation is to laugh at the articles about climate change.洛克微博这条引语的用意很明显是在嘲笑有关气候变化的文章。

选a

50.The various unusual phenomena about climate change are merely non.exist alarms claimed by the scientists and media，would be short-lived.各种有关气候变化的非正常现象不过是短暂的，是科学家和媒体所宣称的，本不存在的危言耸听。

选f

51.The drastic sea-ice melt occurred around Sval bard was only local and limited.发生在斯瓦尔巴特群岛周围剧烈的海冰融化现象只是局部的。

选g

52.It is normal for the waters at northern latitude 81 degrees，29 minutes to be covered with ice.照理说，北纬81度29分的水域应该是结冰的。

选e

53.It is embraced that the number of climate-change researchers will be multiplied one day.终有一天，对气候变化研究的人员数量会不断增加。

选h

54.It is ironic for the leading figure ofclimate-change opponents to quote this piece.作为气候变化反对者的英雄人物，引用这篇文章是很讽刺的。

选h

55.In reality.the universal information in articles about climate change is eventually proved to be unbelievable.事实上，大量关于气候变化的信息最后都被证实是不可信的。

选f

  相关文章:

   1.alterv.改变，改动，变更2.burstvi.n.突然发生，爆裂3.disposevi.除掉;处置;解决;处理(of)4.blastn.爆炸;气流vi.炸，炸掉5.consumev.消耗，耗尽6.splitv.劈开;割裂;分裂a.裂开的7.spitv.吐(唾液等);唾弃8.spillv.溢出，溅出，倒出9.slipv.滑动，滑落;忽略10.

   关于四级写作，通常大家都会背诵一些作文模板句和常用素材，考场上再结合主题自己写一些，这样在作文上拿到的分数就会达到一个相对稳定的档次。想要在此基础上锦上添花，今天四六级和大家分享22020年6月大学英语四级模板范文：景点，希望对您有所帮助。大学英语四级模板范文：景点ThePal

   听力的训练是一项系统工程。只靠多听，采取量中求质的办法，是很难大幅度地提高学生的听力的。要提高学生听力，应从以下几方面入手。1、读准语音正确的语音是听音辨音的基础，只有把英语音学准读准，才能进行听音辨音。因此，我要求学生每天早晨坚持半小时的听录音跟读练习，跟读过程中，只求读准语音。随堂设计5分钟的辨音练习，形式可多样化。比如：一生朗读，其余听辨有无错

   四六级考试网提醒各位考生，11月12日大学英语四六级考试准考证打印入口已经开通了，距离考试的日子越来越近，今天和大家分享2018年12月大学英语六级作文模板：谚语格言类，请看下面的文章内容。文章题目为一句格言或谚语，通常模式为：解释谚语-举例论证-画龙点睛1.阐述名言或主题所蕴涵的意义。2.分析并举例使其更充实。Thegoodol

   2022年6月大学英语四级考试需要提前准备，提前背些范文，对范文里的句子进行灵活改编，能够更容易在写作中拿到高分，四六级网小编为大家整理2022年6月英语四级写作范文，希望对大家的四级考试作文题有帮助~Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:MyViewontheL