- ·上一篇文章:四级单词e开头(四级词汇e开头)
- ·下一篇文章:六级阅读常见同义替换(英语六级阅读同义替换)
2014年12月四级长篇阅读(历年英语四级长篇阅读答案)
A: What do we mean by being ‘talented or gifted’? The most obvious way is to look at the work someone does and if they are capable of significant success, label them as talented. The purely quantitative route — ‘percentage definition’— looks not at individuals, but at simple percentages, such as the top five percent of the population, and labels them — by definition — as gifted. This definition has fallen from favor, eclipsed by the advent of IQ tests, favored by luminaries such as Professor Hans Eysenck, where a series of written or verbal tests of general intelligence leads to a score of intelligence.
B: The IQ test has been eclipsed in turn. Most people studying intelligence and creativity in the new millennium now prefer a broader definition, using a multifaceted approach where talents in many areas are recognized rather than purely concentrating on academic achievement. If we are therefore assuming that talented, creative or gifted individuals may need to be assessed across a range of abilities, does this mean intelligence can run in families as genetic or inherited tendency? Mental dysfunction — such as schizophrenia — can, so is an efficient mental capacity passed on from parent to child?
C: Animal experiments throw some light on this question, and on the whole area of whether it is genetics, the environment or a combination of the two that allows for intelligence and creative ability. Different strains of rats show great differences in intelligence or ‘rat reasoning’. If these are brought up in normal conditions and then run through a maze to reach a food goal, the ‘bright-strain make far fewer wrong turns that the ‘dull-ones’. But if the environment is made dull and boring the number of errors becomes equal. Return the rats to an exciting maze and the discrepancy returns as before — but is much smaller. In other words, a dull rat in a stimulating environment will almost do as well as bright rat who is bored in a normal one. This principle applies to humans too — someone may be born with innate intelligence, but their environment probably has the final say over whether they become creative or even a genius.
D: Evidence now exists that most young children, if given enough opportunities and encouragement, are able to achieve significant and sustainable levels of academic or sporting prowess. Bright or creative children are often physically very active at the same time, and so many receive more parental attention as a result — almost by default — in order to ensure their safety. They may also talk earlier, and this, in turn, breeds parental interest. This can sometimes cause problems with other siblings who may feel jealous even though they themselves may be bright. Their creative talents may be undervalued and so never come to fruition. Two themes seem to run through famously creative families as a result. The first is that the parents were able to identify the talents of each child, and nurture and encourage these accordingly but in an even handed manner. Individual differences were encouraged, and friendly sibling rivalry was not seen as particular problem. If the father is, say, a famous actor, there is no undue pressure for his children to follow him onto the boards, but instead their chosen interests are encouraged. There need not even by any obvious talent in such a family since there always needs to be someone who sets the family career in motion, as in the case of the Sheen acting dynasty.
E: Martin Sheen was the seventh of ten children born to a Spanish immigrant father and an Irish mother. Despite intense parental disapproval he turned his back on entrance exams to university and borrowed cash from a local priest to start a fledgling acting career. His acting successes in films such as Badlands and Apocalypse Now made him one of the most highly-regarded actors of the 1970s. Three sons — Emilio Estevez, Ramon Estevez and Charlie Sheen — have followed him into the profession as a consequence of being inspired by his motivation and enthusiasm.
F: A stream seems to run through creative families. Such children are not necessarily smothered with love by their parents. They feel loved and wanted, and are secure in their home, but are often more surrounded by an atmosphere of work and where following a calling appears to be important. They may see from their parents that it takes time and dedication to be master of a craft, and so are in less of a hurry to achieve for themselves once they start to work.
G: The generation of creativity is complex: it is a mixture of genetics, the environment, parental teaching and luck that determines how successful or talented family members are. This last point — luck — is often not mentioned where talent is concerned but plays an undoubted part. Mozart, considered by many to be the finest composer of all time, was lucky to be living in an age that encouraged the writing of music. He was brought up surrounded by it, his father was a musician who encouraged him to the point of giving up his job to promote his child genius. Mozart himself simply wanted to create the finest music ever written but did not necessarily view himself as a genius — he could write sublime music at will, and so often preferred to lead a hedonistic lifestyle that he found more exciting than writing music to order.
H: Albert Einstein and Bill Gates are two more examples of people whose talents have blossomed by virtue of the times they were living in. Einstein was a solitary, somewhat slow child who had affection at home but whose phenomenal intelligence emerged without any obvious parental input. This may have been partly due to the fact that at the start of the 20th century a lot of the Newtonian laws of physics were being questioned, leaving a fertile ground for ideas such as his to be developed. Bill Gates may have had the creative vision to develop Microsoft, but without the new computer age dawning at the same time he may never have achieved the position on the world stage he now occupies.
1. We can label someone who are capable of significant success as talented.
2. Most people studying intelligence and creativity in the new millennium now prefer a broader definition.
3. Animal experiments are contributed to whether it is genetics, the environment or a combination of the two that allows for intelligence and creative ability.
4. Bright or creative children are often physically very active at the same time.
5. Children in creative families feel loved and wanted, and are secure in their home.
6. The generation of creativity is not simple.
7. Bill Gates is an example of people whose talents have blossomed by virtue of the times they were living in.
8. Evidence shows that bright or creative children are often physically very active and thus receive more parentalattention to ensure their safety.
9. Luck is often not mentioned but an undoubted part of a person how creative or talented.
10. Albert Einstein’s and Bill Gates’ significant success may be due to thetimes they were living in.
1. A
2. B
3. C
4. D
5. F
6. G
7. H
8. D
9. G
10.H
相关文章:
第1篇 2020年六级词汇多少个(历年六级词汇) 作者:admin
1.alterv.改变,改动,变更2.burstvi.n.突然发生,爆裂3.disposevi.除掉;处置;解决;处理(of)4.blastn.爆炸;气流vi.炸,炸掉5.consumev.消耗,耗尽6.splitv.劈开;割裂;分裂a.裂开的7.spitv.吐(唾液等);唾弃8.spillv.溢出,溅出,倒出9.slipv.滑动,滑落;忽略10.
第2篇 四级景点作文(四级旅游景点范文介绍) 作者:admin
关于四级写作,通常大家都会背诵一些作文模板句和常用素材,考场上再结合主题自己写一些,这样在作文上拿到的分数就会达到一个相对稳定的档次。想要在此基础上锦上添花,今天四六级和大家分享22020年6月大学英语四级模板范文:景点,希望对您有所帮助。大学英语四级模板范文:景点ThePal
第3篇 从四个方面来训练和提高六级听力的方法(从四个方面来训练和提高六级听力英语) 作者:admin
听力的训练是一项系统工程。只靠多听,采取量中求质的办法,是很难大幅度地提高学生的听力的。要提高学生听力,应从以下几方面入手。1、读准语音正确的语音是听音辨音的基础,只有把英语音学准读准,才能进行听音辨音。因此,我要求学生每天早晨坚持半小时的听录音跟读练习,跟读过程中,只求读准语音。随堂设计5分钟的辨音练习,形式可多样化。比如:一生朗读,其余听辨有无错
第4篇 六级作文谚语类作文范文(六级作文谚语类作文模板) 作者:admin
四六级考试网提醒各位考生,11月12日大学英语四六级考试准考证打印入口已经开通了,距离考试的日子越来越近,今天和大家分享2018年12月大学英语六级作文模板:谚语格言类,请看下面的文章内容。文章题目为一句格言或谚语,通常模式为:解释谚语-举例论证-画龙点睛1.阐述名言或主题所蕴涵的意义。2.分析并举例使其更充实。Thegoodol
第5篇 关于长假的英语四级作文(长假的利和弊大学英语作文) 作者:admin
2022年6月大学英语四级考试需要提前准备,提前背些范文,对范文里的句子进行灵活改编,能够更容易在写作中拿到高分,四六级网小编为大家整理2022年6月英语四级写作范文,希望对大家的四级考试作文题有帮助~Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic:MyViewontheL