面对灾难的英语四级作文(面对灾难的选择阅读理解)

【今日阅读推荐】本篇阅读材料“面对灾难，人类大脑如何反应”选自《卫报》（原文标题：What your brain does in an emergency 2010.3.16）。如果大家觉得比较简单，就当作泛读材料了解了解，认识几个新单词或新表达方式也不错。如果大家觉得这些材料理解上有难度，不妨当做挑战自己的拔高训练，希望大家都有进步^^

Research into people’s reactions to emergencies aims to make sure there are more survivors in future.

Imagine you’re stuck in a burning building, trying desperately to escape. After stumbling to the end of a smoke-filled corridor, you have to choose whether to turn left or right. The decision could determine whether you live or die – but the way you make it is not as random as you might think, according to Ed Galea, professor of mathematical modelling at the University of Greenwich.

Galea has forged a career out of working out the science and psychology behind how people’s brains function in disaster zones. He has interviewed thousands of survivors, from 300 people who escaped the World Trade Center on 9/11 to plane crash and Paddington rail disaster survivors. The results of his research are used by governments, building designers and emergency workers around the world to try to plan for the effects of future catastrophes.

His latest project, funded by a 2 million (￡1.8m) European Union grant, is BeSeCu (Behaviour, Security and Culture), which involves trying to understand whether culture affects the way people behave in emergency situations. "The question we’re answering is, do people from different countries behave differently in a crisis?", says Galea. "Most of the data that’s used in evacuation analysis is from the UK, US and Australia. There’s an implicit assumption that people everywhere behave the same, but we’re not sure that’s true."

So BeSeCu is carrying out "unannounced evacuation drills" in multistorey university library buildings around Europe, including Poland, Czech Republic and Turkey, and comparing the results with evacuation data from Brazil and the UK. "We’re going to compare the data on response time and behaviour. If it varies in different places, that will suggest a need to change how we plan for emergency situations – we’ll have to take a much more localised approach."

Galea’s interest was triggered by victims’ responses to a tragic fire in the Daegu underground in Korea. "I looked at photographs of the inside of burning carriages, and collaborated with a Korean researcher who interviewed survivors. Most sat around, waiting for instructions from an authority figure. When I presented the findings at a UK conference, it was suggested that my data was irrelevant because ’that would never happen in the UK’. So I started wondering whether people around the world react differently."

Working at Greenwich’s Fire Safety Engineering Group, Galea and his team have designed Exodus, a computer modelling system that can simulate how people behave in emergency evacuations, which is used in 33 countries. It was used in the design of London’s O2 arena, Sydney’s Olympic stadium, the "bird’s nest" arena in Beijing and the Airbus A380.

Now he is adding to the model by analysing data from interviews with survivors of the 7/7 terrorist attacks in London and the Madrid bombings. "By studying how people responded on the underground trains and in the stations, we hope to better understand how the perception of risk, reaction to authority figures and interaction with other survivors influences emergency behaviour." The findings will be used to improve computer software so it better reflects how people behave in emergencies and can be more reliable in building design.

There are also practical ideas that are easier to implement, Galea says. "I’m looking at how people respond to alarms and instructions. If people on trains always wait for an official to tell them what to do, then perhaps we need to improve communication systems on trains so they have a better chance of working in extreme situations."

Galea is also investigating how people think when trying to escape house fires or a flooding house. "We’ve set up an online survey looking at how people move – at intersections, do they go left or right, for example. So far it seems that left-handed and right-handed people behave differently, and so do people who drive on different sides of the road. Working out the patterns will give people a better chance of surviving future disasters."

Galea, who spends his days mapping human behaviour, fell into his work "completely by accident". More than two decades later, he has amassed plenty of advice on getting out of a fire or crash alive. "The main thing is having good situational awareness," he says. "Understand the environment you’re in, whether it’s a plane, train, ship or building, know where your nearest exit is and how you’d escape in a hurry. If you’re travelling with family, plan what you would do in an emergency, like whether you’d try to reunite before escaping, or meet outside."

On planes, Galea recommends choosing a seat close to an exit. "I always try and sit within five rows of an exit on an aisle seat," he says. "Once you’re seated, count the rows to your nearest two exits in case it becomes too dark to see." Galea stresses, however, that planes are "really quite safe".

One thing that does make him upset, however, is disaster movies. The latest to hit our screens is 2012, which Galea says makes him "frustrated about how badly Hollywood gets it wrong".

"Disaster films convey completely the wrong view of how most people behave in these kind of situations," he says. "Hollywood shows people panicking, but my research shows that 9.9 times out of 10, people don’t turn into crazed individuals, but behave quite rationally. They tend to help each other, too."

That, says Galea, is a crucial part of his job. "The knowledge that most people react in a humanist way helps me to get in up in the morning – I come to work knowing that people tend to behave in a supportive, helpful way in emergencies, so any way we can help inform intelligent building design and disaster strategies will help them to survive."

【重点单词及短语】

stuck in 陷入；插入

mathematical modelling 数学建模；数学模型；数学模拟

catastrophe n. 大灾难；大祸

simulate v. 模仿；假装；冒充

emergency evacuation 紧急疏散

intersection n. 十字路口；交集；交叉点；交叉

get it wrong 算错；误解

Question time:

1. What’s the contribution that pro. Ed Galea makes to people in emergencies?

2. Does pro. Ed Galea suppose Hollywood disaster movies helpful in guiding people get out of disasters?

四级备考攻略：作文范文模板大全 做模拟试题 高频词汇记忆 历年真题 四级报班

六级备考攻略：作文范文模板大全 做模拟试题 高频词汇记忆 历年真题 六级报班

新东方四六级频道课程推荐 北京学校报名咨询电话：010-82611818
课程名称	课时	试听	报 名
四级强化精品走读班（45人教师版）	24	试听	咨询
四六级教师阅读/听力/写作单项班	10	试听	咨询
四六级模考串讲班	4	试听	咨询

  相关文章:

  第1篇    四级考试词汇题(英语四级词汇题及答案详解)    作者：admin

   70.gas/gs/n.①气体②煤气③汽油④毒气vt.①用毒气毒(死)②(up)给(汽车)加油【考点】steponthegas表示“踩油门，加大油门”。71.gasoline/.gs`lin，`gslin/n.汽油72.gaze/geiz/v./n.凝视，注视【考点】g

  第2篇    六级翻译饮食(六级口语food safety)    作者：admin

   大学英语六级听力备考需要掌握一些六级高频词汇，关于英语六级听力练习，是整个备考中比较难下手的一部分，今天四六级为大家分享英语六级听力练习：就餐类，希望对您有所帮助。微信公众号【四六级】丨官方微博【@四六级培训】英语六级听力练习：就餐类waiter/waitress男/女服务员pork猪肉order点菜beefsteak

  第3篇    四级词汇g开头(g开头的四级单词)    作者：admin

   正在准备2020年6月英语六级考试的小伙伴们一定有不少同学还在困惑如何高效备考，尽管有一些解题方法及答题技巧，但这都是建立在一定的词汇量基础之上的。当同学们掌握了一定的单词量之后，就会发现在做题的时候很多之前的小问题都会迎刃而解。今天四

  第4篇    四级阅读理解选项分布(四级阅读理解讲解)    作者：admin

   2021年上半年大学英语四六级考试已经结束，各位参加12月四级考试的小伙伴该提前做准备了，四六级网小编为大家整理2021年12月大学英语四级阅读题练习，希望对大家的四级考试阅读题有帮助~Asubjectwhichseemstohavebeeninsufficientlystudiedbydoctorsandpsychologistsistheinflue

  第5篇    虚拟语气六级例句(英语条件句和虚拟语气)    作者：admin

   1.条件句中虚拟语气的形式从句中提出一种与客观现实不相符或根本不可能存在的条件，主句会产生的一种不可能获得的结果。条件句中的虚拟语气根据不同的时间有三种不同的形式。时间从句谓语形式主句谓语形式将来动词过去式(be用we